
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: dam-funk &#8211; toeachizown Vol 1: LAtrik</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indieshuffle.com/dam-funk-toeachizown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indieshuffle.com/dam-funk-toeachizown/</link>
	<description>We shuffle through piles of independent music — old and new — so you don’t have to.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:00:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: animal collective &#8211; summertime clothes (dam-funk remix) :: indie shuffle</title>
		<link>http://www.indieshuffle.com/dam-funk-toeachizown/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>animal collective &#8211; summertime clothes (dam-funk remix) :: indie shuffle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieshuffle.com/?p=1372#comment-80</guid>
		<description>[...] like: animal collective, Dam-funk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like: animal collective, Dam-funk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camden</title>
		<link>http://www.indieshuffle.com/dam-funk-toeachizown/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>camden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieshuffle.com/?p=1372#comment-78</guid>
		<description>I actually literally got introduced to them (soulive) today. i definitely want to check them out further.  but by &#039;viable&#039; i guess I mean less prevalent or influential, at least compared to in its heyday.  it&#039;s certainly changed and developed, and still arguably as good, but it&#039;s also been bastardized by things like &#039;funk metal.&#039;  again, not to say that it&#039;s bad by any means, i still love funk. it just represents a much smaller niche in the music community today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually literally got introduced to them (soulive) today. i definitely want to check them out further.  but by &#8216;viable&#8217; i guess I mean less prevalent or influential, at least compared to in its heyday.  it&#8217;s certainly changed and developed, and still arguably as good, but it&#8217;s also been bastardized by things like &#8216;funk metal.&#8217;  again, not to say that it&#8217;s bad by any means, i still love funk. it just represents a much smaller niche in the music community today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kash</title>
		<link>http://www.indieshuffle.com/dam-funk-toeachizown/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Kash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieshuffle.com/?p=1372#comment-77</guid>
		<description>dam funk is great, saw him live opening for animal collective, but how can you say that funk may not be a viable form of music today? It is perhaps some of the most lively and technically impressive forms of music out there - check out soulive and maybe you will change your mind</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dam funk is great, saw him live opening for animal collective, but how can you say that funk may not be a viable form of music today? It is perhaps some of the most lively and technically impressive forms of music out there &#8211; check out soulive and maybe you will change your mind</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camden andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.indieshuffle.com/dam-funk-toeachizown/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>camden andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieshuffle.com/?p=1372#comment-51</guid>
		<description>good to know, thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good to know, thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicious</title>
		<link>http://www.indieshuffle.com/dam-funk-toeachizown/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieshuffle.com/?p=1372#comment-50</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve been checking for dam-funk for a while.  you left out one of the most important things, that this album isn&#039;t truly out yet.  it&#039;s a 5LP set and the first 3 vols have been released digitally, but we&#039;re still waiting on the last 2 and the whole 5LP set.  
toeachizown vol. 1: LAtrik
toeachizown vol. 2: fly
toeachizown vol. 3: hood
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stonesthrow.com/damfunk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.stonesthrow.com/damfunk&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve been checking for dam-funk for a while.  you left out one of the most important things, that this album isn&#8217;t truly out yet.  it&#8217;s a 5LP set and the first 3 vols have been released digitally, but we&#8217;re still waiting on the last 2 and the whole 5LP set.<br />
toeachizown vol. 1: LAtrik<br />
toeachizown vol. 2: fly<br />
toeachizown vol. 3: hood<br />
<a href="http://www.stonesthrow.com/damfunk" rel="nofollow">http://www.stonesthrow.com/damfunk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geezlouisexyz</title>
		<link>http://www.indieshuffle.com/dam-funk-toeachizown/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>geezlouisexyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indieshuffle.com/?p=1372#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Really liked it, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really liked it, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>